|
(The Statesman)
If there is a point of moaning
between Pranab Mukherjee and George Fernandes, it is the private
sectors reluctance to get involved in producing military
hardware. While the present defence minister is perhaps too
new to his job, to speak of this reluctance with the same
degree of dismay as his predecessor, no less serious is his
concern that three years have elapsed since the doors to private
production were thrown open, 26 per cent FDI to boot, without
any joint ventures worth the name. Ten firms who responded
are in the automotive sector, or were even earlier involved
in producing certain items there is no breakthrough
worth the name. And the items for which letters of intent
are issued are not genuinely hi-tech ones.
Not that India needs to worry
about not getting equipment it seeks, it is spending Rs 40,000
crore annually on defence stores making it one of the worlds
biggest buyers, so sellers are queueing up. The problem arises
from the fact that there are always strings attached to the
sale of military equipment, in addition to potential diplomatic/political
complications, which impact on assured supplies of spares
and product-support. As was manifest when most of the Navys
helicopters were grounded by the sanctions imposed after Pokharan-II.
A high degree of self-reliance was a necessity not
just a noble objective. The ostensible reason for an indifferent
response from the private sector is that procedures prescribed
are cumbersome. That can be remedied. What is more difficult
to deal with is the private sectors fear that it may
not be cost-effective to set up advanced production facilities
when orders are limited. Against that background it is worth
exploring the possibility of defence public sector enterprises
and ordnance factories entering into joint-ventures with private
firms and their foreign partners. This may harmonise private
management skills, established infrastructure with an injection
of got-abroad technology and expertise.
|